GMO Controversy at Monsanto Shareholder Meeting

22 Jan, 2012

On Tuesday, January 24 at 1:30 PM, Monsanto officers and shareholders will vote on a shareholder proposal to create a study of “material financial risks or operational impacts” associated with its chemical products and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

The proposal represents one of the strongest signals to date that the biotech food conglomerate is facing growing consumer, legal, and regulatory uncertainties. As of today, however Monsanto has told John Harrington that they will not recognize his proxy who would speak on behalf of the resolution for only three minutes under normal circumstances.

The meeting itself is only open to shareholders but concerned citizens will be demonstrating outside the northeast entrance to Monsanto’s Lindberg campus beginning at 12:00 noon. Monsanto Headquarters is located at 800 North Lindberg Boulevard in St. Louis, MO.

Adam Eidinger, an organic food activist who recently led a walk from NY to Washington DC on behalf of honest food labeling, will present the shareholder resolution on behalf of Napa, California based Harrington Investments (HII) with help from the Pesticide Action Network of North America (PANNA).

Eidinger will be available for interview before and after the shareholder meeting, which he will drive a “Label GMO” art car to attend. Representatives from HII and PANNA will be also available for interview before and after the shareholder meeting. Eidinger’s written testimony is available by request.

In its statement recommending shareholders to vote against the HII resolution, Monsanto management stated that, “Farmers should have the freedom to choose which production method is best suited for their needs, whether organic, non-GM conventional or biotechnology traits. All of these systems can and do work effectively side by side…”

John Harrington, CEO of Harrington Investments questions the veracity of Monsanto’s statement: “While I am heartened by Monsanto’s sudden concern for the freedom of farmers, the unfortunate reality facing American farmers right now, is that genetic drift from GMO crops is contaminating their conventional and organic crops. This can be disastrous because many GMO crops cannot be sold to important markets, such as Europe, China and Japan. The potential legal implications for Monsanto are staggering.”

Eidinger, who organized last October’s a 100 person, 313 mile “Right2Know March” from New York City to the White House for federally mandated GMO food labeling says: “With the rise or Round-Up resistant ‘superweeds’ the company is simply telling farmers to spray even more toxic herbicides including 2,4 D, the main ingredient in Agent Orange. Many people are struggling to avoid GMOs and chemicals used on them in the food they eat due to serious health and environmental concerns yet Americans have no right to know what we are eating largely due to the close ties Monsanto has to President Obama’s USDA and FDA which has ignored more than 500,000 Americans who have signed on to the petition to the FDA.”

Source: © 2012 PR Newswire Release

About the author

  • Kev C

    It seems that Monsanto are taking this challenge seriously because they are not only recommending the shareholders vote against the resolution but they are also engaging in watered down greenwashing techniques with the press et al regarding farmer freedom to choose. We all know the courts await any farmer who has been contaminated with GMO’s belonging to Monsanto despite the farmer being the victim so it is an empty chalice they are offering here.
    Instead I hope the press and media take a hold of this and push it like crazy and the health issues are made more prominent. That way Monsanto will have no choice but to bow down and do something about the entire travesty they laughingly call the way forward. Biotechnology should never have been let out of the hermetically sealed laboratories.

  • swv

    Has any congressman/woman ever suggested this corporation be dismantled? What effect would it have on our economy if all such corporations were to be forced to operate under the precautionary principle?

  • Rpfroggy

    Monsanto is going to do the GMO study? I will not trust the results.


    We need a class action lawsuit, based on the right to know what we are eating. Everyone should start suing them… All 500,000 people that signed the petition! Unite and we will win!

  • Linda Dabulewicz

    Monsanto testing usually lasts days and sometimes even hours before they come to their conclusions about minute test data.

  • Linda Dabulewicz

    What and lose their golden goose ? Not likely.