Are Antibiotics in Ethanol Endangering Our Health
23 Oct, 2012
by Tom Laskayway, via Grist.org
The debate over the use of antibiotics in farming might have finally hit the mainstream. This summer, ABC’s World News Tonight investigated the link between antibiotic use in industrially farmed chicken and the growing scourge of antibiotic-resistant urinary tract infections in women. Meanwhile, Consumers Union published a survey in which 60 percent of respondents reported that they’d pay more at the supermarket for meat that was free of antibiotics.
So, I thought it might be a good time to check in with the latest news on antibiotics in agriculture. Let’s round up those antibiotic-dosed dogies!
Back in the spring, I wrote about a report produced by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy that accused pharmaceutical companies of illegally marketing antibiotics to the ethanol industry. IATP produced evidence that the Food and Drug Administration knew of this practice, yet did nothing to stop it.
Ethanol producers add antibiotics to the grains to control “infections” during the fermentation process. And, unbeknownst to many eaters, 30 million tons of ethanol byproducts, or “distillers grains,” are fed to livestock here and abroad every year. (As an industrial byproduct, distillers grains are cheap and abundant). But those spent grains also contain enough antibiotic residue to contribute—at least in some cases—to a rise in antibiotic resistance in the animals to which they’re fed.
I received a vague denial from the FDA when I asked them to assess the legality of this practice. But the inquiries (thankfully) did not stop with your intrepid reporter. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) sent a letter to the FDA asking for a bit of an explanation as well.
Earlier this month, the agency responded [PDF]—not by doing further investigations or changing their policy, but by writing a letter. IATP’s blog summarized the response:
… the FDA states it has not recognized any ethanol antibiotics as safe [in ethanol production], nor has it completed a review of the food additive petitions that have been submitted by the manufacturers.
In addition, the letter includes “a clearly stated acknowledgement … that the agency has not carried out sufficient safety reviews to properly assess the multiple risks posed by antibiotic use in ethanol.”
What the letter does not include is a statement that the FDA will crack down on the pharmaceutical companies who are marketing the antibiotics to ethanol producers. It’s worth noting that antibiotics are not required to make ethanol; there are other ways to keep bugs out of the factories. Antibiotics are just an easy (some might say lazy) solution. But this steady stream of medically important antibiotics flowing into farm animals continues to create problems for people.
Click here to read the rest of this article at Grist.org.

loading...
loading...
About the author
Related Posts
-
Avoiding Lead (and other metals) in Your Lipstick
-
How Can We Stop Deceptive Food Marketing?
-
Examining the True Risks of GMO Salmon
-
GMO Salmon: Nearly 2 Million People Tell FDA "No Way!"
-
Food Terrorism: Why We Must Cook Our Way to Health
-
Federal Court Declares FDA Delay of Food Safety Regulations Illegal
-
Victory: Antibiotic to Be Discontinued in Organic Apple and Pear Production
-
Tell Your Representatives to Support the New GMO Labeling Bill!
-
How Biotech Is Gagging Research into GMO Crops
-
Nanosilver: Are We Surrounded by Pesticides?







