Are Antibiotics in Ethanol Endangering Our Health

23 Oct, 2012

by Tom Laskayway, via Grist.org

Cattle in feedlots are fed antibiotic laced ethanol grain byproductsThe debate over the use of antibi­otics in farm­ing might have finally hit the main­stream. This sum­mer, ABC’s World News Tonight inves­ti­gated the link between antibi­otic use in indus­tri­ally farmed chicken and the grow­ing scourge of antibiotic-resistant uri­nary tract infec­tions in women. Meanwhile, Consumers Union pub­lished a sur­vey in which 60 per­cent of respon­dents reported that they’d pay more at the super­mar­ket for meat that was free of antibiotics.

So, I thought it might be a good time to check in with the lat­est news on antibi­otics in agri­cul­ture. Let’s round up those antibiotic-dosed dogies!

Back in the spring, I wrote about a report pro­duced by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy that accused phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies of ille­gally mar­ket­ing antibi­otics to the ethanol indus­try. IATP pro­duced evi­dence that the Food and Drug Administration knew of this prac­tice, yet did noth­ing to stop it.

Ethanol pro­duc­ers add antibi­otics to the grains to con­trol “infec­tions” dur­ing the fer­men­ta­tion process. And, unbe­knownst to many eaters, 30 mil­lion tons of ethanol byprod­ucts, or “dis­tillers grains,” are fed to live­stock here and abroad every year. (As an indus­trial byprod­uct, dis­tillers grains are cheap and abun­dant). But those spent grains also con­tain enough antibi­otic residue to contribute—at least in some cases—to a rise in antibi­otic resis­tance in the ani­mals to which they’re fed.

I received a vague denial from the FDA when I asked them to assess the legal­ity of this prac­tice. But the inquiries (thank­fully) did not stop with your intre­pid reporter. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) sent a let­ter to the FDA ask­ing for a bit of an expla­na­tion as well.

Earlier this month, the agency responded [PDF]—not by doing fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tions or chang­ing their pol­icy, but by writ­ing a let­ter. IATP’s blog sum­ma­rized the response:

… the FDA states it has not rec­og­nized any ethanol antibi­otics as safe [in ethanol pro­duc­tion], nor has it com­pleted a review of the food addi­tive peti­tions that have been sub­mit­ted by the manufacturers.

In addi­tion, the let­ter includes “a clearly stated acknowl­edge­ment … that the agency has not car­ried out suf­fi­cient safety reviews to prop­erly assess the mul­ti­ple risks posed by antibi­otic use in ethanol.”

What the let­ter does not include is a state­ment that the FDA will crack down on the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies who are mar­ket­ing the antibi­otics to ethanol pro­duc­ers. It’s worth not­ing that antibi­otics are not required to make ethanol; there are other ways to keep bugs out of the fac­to­ries. Antibiotics are just an easy (some might say lazy) solu­tion. But this steady stream of med­ically impor­tant antibi­otics flow­ing into farm ani­mals con­tin­ues to cre­ate prob­lems for people.

Click here to read the rest of this arti­cle at Grist.org.

GD Star Rating
load­ing...
GD Star Rating
load­ing...

About the author

Related Posts

QR Code Business Card