Can Pollution Itself Inspire Environmentalism?

02 Aug, 2012

via Michigan State University

Air pollution in ChinaNothing inspires envi­ron­men­tal­ism quite like a smog-filled sky or a con­t­a­m­i­nated river, accord­ing to a new study that also indi­cates that envi­ron­men­tal­ism isn’t just for the prosperous.

People liv­ing in China’s cities who say they’ve been exposed to envi­ron­men­tal harm are more likely to be green: re-using their plas­tic gro­cery bags or recy­cling. Moreover, the study, pub­lished this week in the inter­na­tional jour­nal AMBIO, indi­cates that the poor would sac­ri­fice eco­nomic gain to pro­tect their environment.

“The human and nat­ural worlds are tightly cou­pled and we can­not pro­tect the envi­ron­ment with­out empir­i­cal stud­ies on how rich and poor peo­ple are under­stand­ing and react­ing to the nat­ural world around them.” said Jianguo “Jack” Liu, a co-author of the AMBIO paper and direc­tor of the Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability (CSIS) at Michigan State University. 

The paper, “How Perceived Exposure to Environmental Harm Influences Environmental Behavior in Urban China,” flies in the face of the con­ven­tional wis­dom that the poor can­not afford to pro­tect the environment.

“We feel it’s a major con­tri­bu­tion to pro­vide empir­i­cal evi­dence that envi­ron­men­tal harm is one of the most impor­tant pre­dic­tors of envi­ron­men­tal behav­ior,” said Xiaodong Chen, who con­ducted the study while work­ing on his doc­tor­ate at CSIS.

“Environmental harm could be more impor­tant than eco­nomic sta­tus in pre­dict­ing envi­ron­men­tal behav­ior. If peo­ple are affected by degraded envi­ron­men­tal con­di­tions, then even peo­ple with low eco­nomic sta­tus still may sac­ri­fice some eco­nomic ben­e­fit in order to pro­tect the environment.”

Indeed, the grow­ing envi­ron­men­tal con­scious­ness in China has been accom­pa­nied by increased involve­ment by the pub­lic in envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion. For instance, the paper notes that in 2005 there were some 1,000 protests per week related to envi­ron­men­tal pol­lu­tion in China, a num­ber pro­jected to increase rapidly.

Scientists have stud­ied envi­ron­men­tal atti­tudes for years, but the paper notes that it’s behav­ior that ulti­mately counts. There is a grow­ing body of lit­er­a­ture on envi­ron­men­tal atti­tudes and behav­ior in China, yet lit­tle is known about how peo­ple per­ceive and respond to per­sonal expo­sure to envi­ron­men­tal harm.

Chen and co-authors Liu; Nils Peterson of North Carolina State University and a CSIS alum­nus; Vanessa Hull, doc­toral can­di­date in CSIS; Chuntian Lu, MSU soci­ol­ogy doc­toral stu­dent; and Dayong Hong of Renmin University in China used China’s General Social Survey of 2003, which was the first nation­wide sur­vey to address this issue.

Some 5,000 urban respon­dents were asked specif­i­cally about their envi­ron­men­tal behav­ior — if they sorted their garbage to sep­a­rate recy­clables, re-used plas­tic bags, talked about envi­ron­men­tal issues with fam­ily or friends, par­tic­i­pated in envi­ron­men­tal edu­ca­tion pro­grams, vol­un­teered in envi­ron­men­tal orga­ni­za­tions or took part in envi­ron­men­tal litigation.

The peo­ple tak­ing the sur­vey were allowed to define  envi­ron­men­tal harm for themselves.

The authors found that actions that resulted in direct results such as envi­ron­men­tal lit­i­ga­tion were the ones that peo­ple most likely turned to after being exposed to envi­ron­men­tal harm. Other actions, such as trash recy­cling pro­grams, may pro­duce indi­rect results. However, people’s views about the envi­ron­ment are most likely to inspire them to par­tic­i­pate in envi­ron­men­tal behav­iors if those behav­iors are ones that they can con­trol, such as re-using plas­tic bags and talk­ing about envi­ron­men­tal issues.

“Basically, it means that if peo­ple are affected by envi­ron­men­tal harm, they feel they should do some­thing pos­i­tive, and some­thing they them­selves can con­trol,” Chen said.

The find­ings, Chen said, can help instruct pol­icy to trans­form recog­ni­tion of envi­ron­men­tal harm into envi­ron­men­tal action.

The sur­vey was admin­is­tered jointly by the Survey Research Center of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and the Department of Sociology at Renmin University of China.

The research was funded by the National Science FoundationMSU AgBioResearch, and the Giorgio Ruffolo Fellowship in Sustainability Science at Harvard University. Chen now is an assis­tant pro­fes­sor of geog­ra­phy at University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.

Source: Michigan State University release

GD Star Rating
load­ing...
GD Star Rating
load­ing...

About the author

Related Posts

QR Code Business Card