Environmental Chemicals Fifty Years After Silent Spring

28 Sep, 2012

by Joseph J. Mangano, Janette D. Sherman, via AlterNet.org

Rachel Carson and Silent SpringFifty years ago, a Johns Hopkins–educated zool­o­gist did some­thing that few at the time thought was pos­si­ble. With the pub­li­ca­tion of one book, she started a national debate about the uni­ver­sally accepted use of syn­thetic pes­ti­cides, the irre­spon­si­bil­ity of sci­ence, and the lim­its of tech­no­log­i­cal promise. She also chal­lenged the metasta­tic growth of the syn­thetic chem­i­cals indus­try that grew out of World War II.

Silent Spring was Rachel Carson’s third book, fol­low­ing The Sea Around Us and The Edge of the SeaThe Sea Around Us had won the 1952 National Book Award for non­fic­tion and remained on the New York Times best­seller list for 21 months.

Yet it is unlikely that Carson, who had spent most of her career as an edi­tor for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, had any idea of what the pub­li­ca­tion of Silent Spring would engen­der.

Carson became inter­ested in the harm­ful effects of pes­ti­cides, espe­cially DDT, in the late 1950s. DDT was first com­mer­cially pro­duced just prior to World War II, and was used to reduce the threats posed by insects to U.S. troops overseas.

After the war, DDT was pro­moted as a great sci­en­tific advance and was widely and suc­cess­fully used as an insect killer in the United States. The chem­i­cal was con­sid­ered to be so benign that par­ents casu­ally watched their chil­dren run­ning in bil­low­ing white DDT clouds sprayed from trucks in res­i­den­tial neighborhoods.

Carson’s research focused on organic pes­ti­cides like chlor­dane, hep­tachlor, and aldrin, as well as DDT. She doc­u­mented the wide­spread death of birds that had been exposed to the chem­i­cals, as well as repro­duc­tive, birth, and devel­op­men­tal abnor­mal­i­ties in mam­mals. All life, she wrote, is a “chem­i­cal fac­tory” depen­dent upon oxy­gen to power the cell machin­ery. Citing the work of Nobel sci­en­tist Otto Warburg, she explained in clear terms why repeated small expo­sures to pes­ti­cides and nuclear radi­a­tion change the abil­ity of the cell to carry out nor­mal activ­i­ties, result­ing in malig­nancy or defec­tive offspring—the rea­son there is no “safe” dose of a car­cino­gen. Many sci­en­tific experts shared her concerns.

The New Yorker ran three excerpts of Silent Spring in June 1962, before the offi­cial September 27 pub­li­ca­tion date. The response was swift and resound­ing. CBS began prepar­ing a nation­ally broad­cast spe­cial on the book. Page one of the July 22 New York Times fea­tured a story enti­tled “Silent Spring Is Now a Noisy Summer.” On August 29, a reporter attend­ing President Kennedy’s press con­fer­ence asked if the fed­eral gov­ern­ment was exam­in­ing the grow­ing con­cern about DDT and other pes­ti­cides. Kennedy responded: “Yes…I think par­tic­u­larly, of course, since Miss Carson’s book.” A month before the pub­li­ca­tion date, Houghton Mifflin had advance orders for 40,000 copies and had a 150,000-copy con­tract with the Book-of-the-Month Club.

The chem­i­cal indus­try didn’t wait to read the book. Carson’s short but dev­as­tat­ing trea­tise was a threat to their bot­tom line, and the indus­try that man­u­fac­tured DDT and other pes­ti­cides Carson had described reacted angrily to her sci­en­tif­i­cally sound argu­ments that their prod­ucts were harm­ful. They attacked Carson’s exper­tise. They attacked her meth­ods. They attacked her moti­va­tions. They attacked her con­clu­sions. They threat­ened to sue Houghton Mifflin and The New Yorker.

In a relent­less cam­paign to destroy her char­ac­ter, the indus­try dis­trib­uted pam­phlets, pub­lished arti­cles, and vil­i­fied Carson in media inter­views. They described her as “fanatic” and “hys­ter­i­cal,” yet almost all inter­na­tional sci­en­tists agreed with Carson. A Scientific Advisory Committee assem­bled by Kennedy issued a sup­port­ive report in May 1963. In response to the shrill attacks of her indus­try crit­ics, Carson calmly stuck to the facts. She died at age 56 from breast can­cer, 18 months after Silent Spring was pub­lished.

Many regard Carson as the founder of the American envi­ron­men­tal move­ment. Yet the move­ment had already begun. Albert Schweitzer, well-known sci­en­tists such as Linus Pauling, pedi­a­tri­cian Benjamin Spock, and Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas had already been speak­ing out against the dan­gers of above-ground atom-bomb test­ing. Citizen groups like Women Strike for Peace orga­nized increas­ingly large demon­stra­tions against such tests.

But to a large extent, Silent Spring sparked the move­ment that endures today. In 1967, sci­en­tists and activists founded the Environmental Defense Fund. On April 29, 1970, one week after wide­spread demon­stra­tions on the first Earth Day, President Nixon’s Advisory Council on Executive Action pro­posed the Environmental Protection Agency, which became a real­ity later that year. And in June 1972, after three years of fed­eral hear­ings and sci­en­tific inquiries into the ques­tion Carson raised in Silent Spring, EPA Director William Ruckelshaus issued an order that banned the use of DDT in the United States. The envi­ron­men­tal move­ment was in full swing.

Click here to read the rest of this arti­cle at AlterNet.org.

GD Star Rating
load­ing...
GD Star Rating
load­ing...
Environmental Chemicals Fifty Years After Silent Spring, 10.0 out of 10 based on 1 rating

About the author

Related Posts

QR Code Business Card