The Human Experiment: Living with Untested Chemicals

27 Oct, 2012

by Claire Thompson, via Grist.org

The Human ExperimentDana Nachman was a pro­ducer at NBC when she wrote a story on how to make your home less toxic. “It was some­thing I never gave an ounce of thought to before,” she says. In her research, she learned not only about the tens of thou­sands of chem­i­cals lurk­ing in every­day prod­ucts, but that most of those chem­i­cals have never been inde­pen­dently tested for their safety. Meanwhile, rates of tough-to-explain health prob­lems like breast can­cer, autism, and infertility—many of which have been linked to toxic exposure—are on the rise. A mother of young chil­dren, Nachman found this upset­ting enough to turn it into the sub­ject of her next doc­u­men­tary (her first two films tack­led wrong­ful con­vic­tions and ter­ror­ism).

The Human Experiment, nar­rated by Sean Penn and co-directed by Don Hardy, fol­lows three fam­i­lies moti­vated by health prob­lems to fight the pow­er­ful chem­i­cal indus­try lobby on behalf of everyone’s safety.

Nachman, Hardy, and pro­ducer Chelsea Matter plan to start sub­mit­ting the film to fes­ti­vals and look­ing for dis­tri­b­u­tion next year. In the mean­time, they’re work­ing on devel­op­ing an app to help con­sumers choose the safest prod­ucts and min­i­mize tox­ins in their homes.

caught up with Nachman dur­ing a break from edit­ing the film to learn more about our toxic world and whether there’s any­thing we can do to change it.

Q. Was I naive to assume safety test­ing was part of the stan­dard pro­ce­dure to get a prod­uct on the market?

A. Most peo­ple assume that these things are vet­ted before they get put on the store shelves, and that’s absolutely not true. Why? The answer is pretty com­pli­cated, but there was a law estab­lished in 1976 called the Toxic Substances Control Act. It’s very out­dated. We’re deal­ing today with tens of thou­sands of chem­i­cals in every­day life, with the same laws we’ve had since before there were so many. [The TSCA gen­er­ally excludes sub­stances like food, drugs, cos­met­ics, and pesticides.]

Q. How did we come to live among so many chemicals?

A. A lot of these chem­i­cals have been here for a long time. But they’re just ubiq­ui­tous now. There’s 80,000 chem­i­cals used in soci­ety today. [The more] mod­ern con­ve­niences that we use … the more chem­i­cals we’re using. Back in the ’70s peo­ple knew about cer­tain [sub­stances] like DDT and PCBs, and they took action to limit those, among other things. But a lot of work on envi­ron­men­tal health has only started in earnest since the begin­ning of the 1990s.

A main thing in our movie is that we shouldn’t wait until we have absolute proof that these things are bad for us to make some changes. For exam­ple, in the 1920s, the [cig­a­rette] com­pa­nies knew that tobacco causes can­cer. Now it’s been 100 years, almost, and tobacco is still killing people.

Somebody just the other day asked me what I thought about BPA. I said I don’t know defin­i­tively; I do believe there are prob­lems with BPA, enough so that I try to limit my children’s expo­sure to BPA as much as I pos­si­bly can. And if it turns out there’s noth­ing wrong with BPA, great. But com­pa­nies mak­ing a lot of money off of our pur­chas­ing these things with­out hav­ing to do oblig­a­tory testing—that’s not okay with me.

Click here to read the rest of this arti­cle at Grist.org.

GD Star Rating
load­ing...
GD Star Rating
load­ing...
The Human Experiment: Living with Untested Chemicals, 10.0 out of 10 based on 1 rating

About the author

Related Posts

QR Code Business Card