Why Big Tobacco Shills Are Pushing to Stop GMO Labeling in California

15 Aug, 2012

Guest post by Michele Simon, Appetite for Profit

Big Tobacco lobbyists are pushing to stop GMO labeling in CaliforniaThe food indus­try really hates it when you com­pare them to Big Tobacco. They try to deny the neg­a­tive asso­ci­a­tion by claim­ing that food is dif­fer­ent than tobacco. Of course that’s true, but why are the same con­sul­tants that have worked for the tobacco indus­try now shilling for Big Food, oppos­ing the bal­lot ini­tia­tive that would require label­ing of all foods con­tain­ing GMO ingredients?

Hiring Secret Consultants for the Dirty Work

The lat­est finan­cial fil­ings in California for the “No on 37: Coalition Against the Deceptive Food Labeling Scheme” – reveal a $7,500 pay­ment to the Sacramento-based polit­i­cal con­sult­ing firm, MB Public Affairs.

Here is how the Los Angeles Times described the firm last year:

MB Public Affairs is headed by Mark Bogetich, a gar­ru­lous oper­a­tive known to his friends as “Bogey,” who has helped a num­ber of Republican can­di­dates neu­tral­ize their oppo­nents. In recent years, MB Public Affairs has worked for Altria, once known as the Phillip Morris Cos. …

Bogetich has also been called “the go-to guy for [the Republican] party,” and “the only game in town.” The L.A. Times arti­cle explains how last year MB Public Affairs filed more than 50 pub­lic record act requests to dig up dirt on a small but effec­tive group called the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy. No won­der, since the orga­ni­za­tion has scored such impor­tant vic­to­ries as a liv­ing wage for work­ers, which would threaten plenty of businesses.

But which ones? Who knows, because by hir­ing MB Public Affairs to do its dirty work, indus­try gets to keep its nose clean – a clas­sic Big Tobacco tac­tic. Well-known brands such as PepsiCo (which I wrote about last week) and Kraft don’t want to be asso­ci­ated with neg­a­tive cam­paign­ing, so they farm out the job to con­sult­ing firms. In this case, they went right to the top, or the bot­tom. Things are likely to get ugly.

Creating Front Groups for the Dirty Work

Another tac­tic honed by Big Tobacco is to form a front group, which appears to be made up of small busi­nesses and oth­ers designed to give the impres­sion of a grass­roots cam­paign, but in real­ity is funded by large cor­po­ra­tions. This tac­tic, known as an Astroturfing, is alive and well with “No on 37,” which describes itself as, “A broad coali­tion of fam­ily farm­ers, sci­en­tists, doc­tors, tax­pay­ers, small busi­nesses, labor, food com­pa­nies, biotech­nol­ogy com­pa­nies and grocers.

Small farm­ers and small busi­nesses? I don’t see any listed on the “Who We Are” page. I do see many not-so-small trade groups rep­re­sent­ing numer­ous not-so-small cor­po­ra­tions, some of them from out­side California, includ­ing CropLife America, which is a trade group for the biotech and pes­ti­cide industry.

Also, the “No on 37” cam­paign is rep­re­sented by the law firm, Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk, which has a sor­did his­tory of stealth tac­tics such as Astroturfing. And no won­der, with for­mer Phillip Morris out­side coun­cil Tom Hiltachk as the campaign’s trea­surer. (His firm’s address is listed on the web­page for where to send dona­tions; can’t get much cozier with the No cam­paign than that.)

Hiltachk had this disin­gen­u­ous quote about the GMO label­ing ini­tia­tive back in February: “Farmers and food pro­duc­ers strongly oppose this costly, ill-conceived label­ing propo­si­tion.” There are those invis­i­ble farm­ers again.

No stranger to California pol­i­tics, Hiltachk’s firm rep­re­sents the California Republican Party and helped make Arnold Schwarzenegger gov­er­nor by orches­trat­ing the statewide recall cam­paign of for­mer Governor Gray Davis.

According to PolluterWatch, Tom Hiltachk and his firm are well known for cre­at­ing front groups that pro­mote or attack bal­lot ini­tia­tives at the behest of the firm’s wealthy cor­po­rate clients: “In the past Hiltachk has attacked anti-smoking ini­tia­tives while being paid by major tobacco corporations.”

And this scathing arti­cle at ThinkProgress from 2010 describes Hiltachk’s attempt to repeal California’s clean energy pol­icy and says his “under-the-radar tac­tics of shift­ing money around and using phony groups are noth­ing new.” Specifically:

During the eight­ies and nineties, Hiltachk and his law part­ners helped the tobacco indus­try, with fund­ing from Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds, coor­di­nate a vari­ety of stealth front groups. While his law firm received over a mil­lion from tobacco inter­ests, Hiltachk helped orga­nize “Californians for Smokers’ Rights,” a sup­pos­edly “grass­roots” group that relied on tobacco indus­try con­sumer lists to mobi­lize oppo­si­tion to anti-smoking ini­tia­tives.

Another Big Tobacco front group Hiltachk’s firm man­aged wasCalifornians for Fair Business Policy,” which fought local efforts to enact smoke-free bans in California in the early 1990s.

This is going to be a busy elec­tion sea­son for Hiltachk, as he is also the mas­ter­mind behind the decep­tive union-busting Proposition 32, about which a local California paper writes: “if you liked Citizens United, you will love Prop 32.” As the New Yorker sums it up in an arti­cle describ­ing the firm’s shady oper­a­tions, “They spe­cial­ize in ini­tia­tives that are the oppo­site of what they sound like.”

Another group with Big Tobacco ori­gins now spread­ing lies about the GMO label­ing ini­tia­tive is the unsub­tle front group, “California Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse,” whose exec­u­tive direc­tor recently warned us to “beware of trial lawyers lurk­ing in your food.” (It seems lawyers are scarier than alter­ing the genetic code of the food sup­ply.) According to the Center for Media and Democracy’s Sourcewatch, Philip Morris is a pri­mary fun­der of var­i­ous “Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse” groups, which under the guise of tort reform aim to make it harder to bring law­suits for prob­lems caused by haz­ardous products.

Doubt is Their Product

In sum, the food indus­try, to oppose a sim­ple label­ing law, is hir­ing lawyers and con­sul­tants with ties to the tobacco indus­try, to deploy stealth tac­tics such as cre­at­ing front groups, dig­ging up dirt on oppo­nents, and spread­ing out­right lies.

For decades the tobacco indus­try and its shills hid the truth by deploy­ing its most effec­tive weapon: man­u­fac­tur­ing doubt about the health haz­ards of smok­ing. How many mil­lions of Americans died as a result of Big Tobacco’s decep­tive and cyn­i­cal cam­paign? Why would we trust these same oper­a­tors now?

You can hardly blame indus­try for call­ing on such shady char­ac­ters. Big Food has seen the polling data show­ing that more than 90 per­cent of con­sumers want to see GMO foods labeled. When you don’t have the peo­ple or the truth on your side, all you have left is play­ing dirty.

Michele is a pub­lic health lawyer who has been research­ing and writ­ing about the food indus­try and food pol­i­tics since 1996. Visit her site at www.EatDrinkPolitics.com/

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube 

GD Star Rating
load­ing...
GD Star Rating
load­ing...
Why Big Tobacco Shills Are Pushing to Stop GMO Labeling in California, 10.0 out of 10 based on 2 ratings

About the author

Related Posts

  • Your1Friend

    Thank you, Michele.

    I am almost at a loss for words when I pon­der what has become of our coun­try. And while I am well aware that Sacramento has long been a bas­tion of cor­rup­tion, I find myself absolutely shocked by these socio­pathic PR peo­ple — California’s pro­pa­ganda mafia.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    GD Star Rating
    loading...
QR Code Business Card